Women’s Health Post Partum project (CDS, GDM, eCQM)
Partners implementing status
EHR changes - technical
Where you think you'll be 1-2 months from now
a. OCHIN - Michele Whitt
b. AllianceChicago - Roxane Padilla
Great measure - very exciting.
Is there a deadline? Mostly rolling, but there are certain review cycles.
Lisa and Michele both have feedback - would like to go in depth.
Have a comment period followed by a discussion.
How to distinguish this from UDS PP depression measure?
CMS has a measure for exclusive breastfeeding?
Care transition care process..
This is critical to maternal mortality prevention.
Updates – -
AMIA registration April 8
HRSA NTTAP session
|Data Collection Results|
AMIA CIC touch base
S06: Panel - Inequity in Health Information Technology: Women's Health Data Elements, Interoperability, USCDI v2 and Terminology Challenges on May 19, 2021 EDT.
Hello! Deadline for early registration - you can charge registration to the project
All presenters are required to register for the AMIA 2021 Virtual Clinical Informatics Conference by Friday, A
Early rates apply through Thursday, April 8. After April 8 regular rates apply.
Invite OCHIN to Alliance meeting Friday or –
April 16 is Pedro B Carneiro bday!!
for UCSF Women's Health Contraception - there is no expectation that partners have to submit that by a specific date because there is no signed agreement SOW yet. There is a change package that NACHC will ask partners to review, but partners do not have to use that specific tool - NACHC will create a 1-page form that partners would fill out to document that QI changes they wanted to implement.
Next All _Partners Meeting
|Jamie Kim's question on OPA CDC call - do we have lab values (results for GDM?) as part of this data set?|
Jamie Kim's question on OPA CDC call - do we have lab values (results for GDM?) as part of this data set?
the actual results or within or outside reference range vs normal
AllianceChicago - Yes - we are using lab values to create GDM=YES if it was not coded as an ICD code. Yes, hoping to use those values. Using them pre-natal to validate and identify patients who might be at risk, so they can generate a list of higher risk patients if there is not an ICD. Already doing this - can be modified if NACHC prefers Yes/NO rather than just values.
OCHIN - Yes, we can support the results w/in the query, but have not pulled in reference ranges. Yes, it is useful information. Wants to think about. OCHIN is already supplying the values, but would have to consider if reference ranges/abnormal flags would be feasible.
Do you prefer NACHC to dump in the reference ranges and the values? Note - reference ranges may be different.